« Tuesday Hangovers | Main | Wednesday Hangovers »

June 20, 2007

SBBT Stop: Holly Black

Holly_3Holly Black is the New York Times best-selling author of three books for young adults--Tithe, Valiant, and Ironside--and the younger-skewing Spiderwick Chronicles (an adaptation of which will appear soonish on a movie screen near you). She has things graphical and novelly in the works, and a master plan for world domination involving Dungeons & Dragons and science fiction writers. She is, basically, awesome. (photo credit: Chris Barzak, at Sycamore Hill 2007)

GB: Okay, the first question I always ask is about process, because the Shaken & Stirred readers, they love the write porn. What's your process like when you're working on a novel? (You can start anywhere you like, getting the idea, actually beginning to write, trapped beneath a deadline, etcetera.) (Astute readers are probably going to notice this is the exact same question I started with yesterday: I'm lazy.)

HB: Every time I start a new book, I have a new theory of how to write one. For example, when I started Ironside, I thought that maybe I could outline by scenes instead of chapters. That worked about as well as outlining by chapters had. Then with my new book, I was thinking maybe I could write it all in first person to avoid getting bogged down in description, then convert it to third and add description. So far, all that has given me is a lot of leftover me's and I's.

What I'm looking for is a way around my totally inefficient writing process which goes like this: 

1) I have a whole bunch of things I'm interested in and I want to write about and a character that may or may not have anything to do with those things.

2) I try and puzzle-piece together a plot. I wind up leaving a bunch of stuff out and adding new stuff.  Possibly I retain only one or two bits of what I started with.

 3) I write the first chapter. I revise it.

 4) I write the second chapter. I decide that the first chapter doesn't quite work any more. I revise the first chapter. That changes the second chapter. I revise that too.

 5) I write a third chapter. It changes everything! I revise from the beginning again.

 6) I notice that my puzzle-piece plot outline no longer even vaguely resembles the novel I'm working on.

 7) In a panic, send what I have to writing group friends. They have some thoughts. Revise again! And so on. I know that one is supposed to write through to the end of a first draft, but I never manage it.

Being trapped beneath a deadline is scary, because you wind up having to write so fast that you no longer have time to consider whether what you are writing works and you have to rely on the eyes and ears of the people around you more. I try and remember that I need time to think about the work I've done and that I need to make sure I give myself that time.

GB: Your three young adult novels--Tithe, Valiant, and Ironside--are all set in the same universe. I always find this tremendously appealing, novels where the same characters and places can be found in different lights, because it gives such a sense of largeness to the fictional world. When you finished Tithe, did you know you'd revisit the world? How did this world evolve for you as you were writing? (Also, is your next book set in the same universe?)

HB: I also really love novels set in the same world, so that the world seems bigger and the intersections between characters with history more interesting. It is one of the things I love about Charles de Lint's Newford stories. That said, although I intended Valiant to be in the same world as Tithe (and Ironside), I didn't know it would be connected as tightly as it wound up being.

When I finished Tithe, I had been working on the book for so long that when I finished I was relieved to be done with those characters and that world. I thought I would never write about them again. Then about a month later, I had the idea for Ironside and wrote a chunk of what would become the first two chapters and I realized that I wasn't sick of the characters at all.

The graphic novels that I've been working on with Ted Naifeh (called The Good Neighbors) are set on the other coast and I'm hoping that they could be considered part of the same universe, although the faeries operate somewhat differently. My next novel won't be in that universe, though--at least, there's currently no overlap in terms of characters or creatures. 

GB: You are cold, cold, cold to your characters--you put your characters through more terrible things than anyone else I can think of. Do you ever secretly fear they will come to life and gang up on you? Or, more seriously, is it ever hard when you're working to put these characters in such awful predicaments? Do you ever long to cop out and have a mean faery turn into a kitten?

HB:
Really? Me? I feel like I am such a pushover because I always give them what they want in the end.

But I admit that I am very pleased when I think of something just awful to do to one of them.

GB: You are a master of structure and plot. No, you are. How do you put a book together? Do you do a lot of thinking about it up front or does that come in revision?

HB:
Characterization is the fun part for me, but because I find plot hard I've thought about it a lot more. If I have developed some skill with it, it's because I really found it to be a challenge to get my head around. As you can see from the summary of my process, I think about it up front as much as I can, but it's something that continuously evolves through revision.

I remember reading books on plot before I knew how to put one together--they often represent plot with an inverted check mark, where the action of the story rises steadily to climax and then quickly drops down to resolution. My personal breakthrough came when I realized that I understood plotting a lot better if I imagined a second check mark overlapping the first. The first check--the one that I might now term "the time-limiting plot" or "the plot that will be in the summary on the back jacket" might be something like "A dragon is attacking a king's lands and he has to figure out what to do about it." But that isn't a novel. For one thing, if all that happens is a dragon attacking, the novel is kind of boring. For another, if all that happens at the end is that the dragon or the king is dead is, it's not particularly satisfying.

But by imagining a secondary plot, a "personal plot" that starts on the first page, provides most of the tension for the first part of the novel, and is usually at the center of the last scene, I understood things better. For example, in our dragon-attack novel, the personal plot might be "the queen is in love with the king's brother." The tension between these two stories (perhaps the king goes to fight the dragon because he nobly plans on dying so his queen and his brother can be together; perhaps he sends his brother to kill the dragon to get rid of him), and the way the climaxes and resolutions of each story relate to each other, finally let me start plotting with some degree of success and make some sense out of the book I was working on.

People who understand plot better will probably see this as intensely simplistic, and there certainly are lots of different ways to construct plot, but it was the realization that opened plot up for me.

GB: Unicorns?

HB:
Well, they're better than the alternative.

GB: Tell me some books you've been loving lately.

HB:
I just read Ysabeau Wilce's Flora Segunda and adored it. Ditto E. Lockhart's Dramarama, which took me back to the summer art program I went to in my freshman year of high school and which utterly changed the way I saw myself. I also love Kathleen Duey's harrowing magic school book, Skin Hunger. And Cecil Castellucci's Beige, which I think is her best book yet. Emma Bull's Territory, which was so, so, so good. Also the book that Christopher Rowe just started but is trying to pretend is a short story.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Awesome. Pure awesome. Thanks, ladies.

I, too, am excited about Christopher Rowe's novel.

Very nice interview! Thanks for it. :)

You can telI I was at Sycamore Hill 'cause I was all crazy about process and writing theories.

Thanks, Gwenda!

Thanks, ladies -- and thank you, Holly, for explaining plot ('s helpful).

Another great interview. Thanks, Gwenda and Holly!

So cool! Thanks for the great interview!

Ooh, Skin Hunger. We likes the magic school books we do. The TBR list is beginning to teeter...

Nice interview. I need to read these some of these books. Thanks!

Post a comment

My Photo

Read Read

  • E. Lockhart: Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks, The

    E. Lockhart: Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks, The
    You might think the world doesn't need any more boarding school novels, but if you haven't read this one then you're wrong, wrong, wrong. E. Lockhart has surpassed herself with this fable of a girl coming into her own and challenging the boy's club at her prep school -- while falling in love with its members at the same time. Lockhart never simplifies or skirts gender issues and power dynamics, and lets Frankie be realistic instead of a treatise disguised as a character. The sly omniscient narrator tells the story perfectly, and leaves hope that maybe one girl can change the world. More novels as funny and true and perfect as this one, please.

  • Kathi Appelt: The Underneath

    Kathi Appelt: The Underneath
    Appelt's first novel is a beautiful, magical fantasy for younger readers that will instantly become a classic. Seriously. I can imagine this book being in classrooms right alongside Charlotte's Web in a hundred years. The writing is poetic in the good way, and there's a lamia. Children are going to absolutely fall in love with Appelt's equally kind and brutal universe, where love conquers most, and it can take millenia to come to your senses.

  • Jincy Willett: The Writing Class

    Jincy Willett: The Writing Class
    With her second novel, Willett matches the perfect pitch and execution of her brilliant short stories. Every writer will want to read this novel--very little wincing is involved, but expect a great deal of laughter. C and I found ourselves reading pieces aloud, after howling provoked the "what's so funny?" question. As with any good writing workshop or class, the characters become more appealing as you get to know them, and ultimately what she has pulled off is a satisfying mystery, and a satisfying exploration of humanity. Amy Gallup is a character to remember.

  • Karen Joy Fowler: Wit's End

    Karen Joy Fowler: Wit's End
    A new novel by Karen Fowler really is something to be excited about, unlike many of the writers for whom such praise gets bandied about. (If you're smirking because you think you know something about her work from the title--not the book--The Jane Austen Book Club, please go sit in the corner and read any of her novels. You're welcome.) This is an unmystery-like mystery, concerned not so much with dead bodies--though there are plenty--as with the mysteries of healing and the heart, politics and people. How is it that a writer gets a lens on the present that's as revealing as the one she employs in historical fiction? Now that's a mystery. Highly recommended.

  • Steve Erickson: Zeroville

    Steve Erickson: Zeroville
    Steve Erickson novels are often like dreams, or revelations, or discovered artifacts, or written just for you. Zeroville's no different, although it is perhaps the most readily graspable example of his work to date. The Rosetta Stone is there; the secret decoder ring is a film projector. The dizzying Hollywood confidential stylings will make your inner film geek happy, but the uncovering of a truly mythic cinematic story--since cinema has existed forever--of sacrifice and redemption is even more memorable. See also: this review.

  • Ursula Dubosarsky: The Red Shoe (Neal Porter Books)

    Ursula Dubosarsky: The Red Shoe (Neal Porter Books)
    Set in Sydney during WWII, this wonderful novel travels between the view from inside each of three sisters. Dubosarsky perfectly captures the differences that come from being the younger, older, or middle child. Perfectly conjuring the period, and yet creating a completely accessible story, the narrative contrasts chapters focusing on the family with interstitials from the Sydney newspapers of the time, stories of polio, the H-bomb, and a defecting Russian spy (who happens to be in hiding next door). Nothing here is heavy-handed. Everything is perfectly balanced. It's a beautiful, beautiful novel. See my full take here.

2008 Reading List

Send Me Books

  • G. Bond

    P.O. Box 1304

    Lexington, KY 40588-1304

Picture This

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from gwenda. Make your own badge here.

Friend Me

Tribe

Tip Jar

It All Helps!

Tip Jar